ITS HARD TO SAY WHAT IS TRUE

Since the start of time, many humans have claimed to see extraterrestrial beings or aliens. These life forms are called extraterrestrial because they originated from other worlds/places. While many humans refuse to accept the idea of their existence, many scientists consider extraterrestrial life to be plausible, especially considering their own history within human life. These scientists maintain that billions of years ago, it was the genetic complexity of organisms that brought humans into being, and this same genetic complexity could have also brought aliens to life. Some say that aliens resemble the form of humans but they generally look dark/scary. Though there is still no direct evidence of their existence, several undoctored photographs have been released by eyewitnesses to prove that they actually exist. Its almost to the point in this day and age that one in 6-7 humans have seen something themselves, be it an alien, ufo or even big foot.

Spotting an alien is almost like seeing a ghost. You think you seen something, but it was fast and gone quick. So it is hard to say what it was. There are never good clean, clear pictures of them for some reason. We can always think and hope or hope against something being here and real, but to this day we are still not 100% sure of anything

So keep your eyes to the sky & hope what you will!

Aliens from long ago

According to ancient theorists, aliens with superior knowledge of science and engineering landed on our rock thousands of years ago, sharing their expertise with early humans and forever changing the course of human history. But how did this concept come about, and is there any evidence to prove it?
Alien theory grew out of the centuries-old idea that life is on other planets, and that humans and aliens have crossed paths before. The theme of human-alien interaction was thrust into mainstream in the 1960s, driven by a wave of UFO sightings and popular films like 2001: A Space Odyssey. The NASA program played no small part in this as well: If mankind could travel to other planets, why couldn’t aliens visit Earth?
In 1968, the Swiss author Erich von Däniken published Chariots of the Gods?, which became a immediate bestseller. In it, he put forth his ideas that, thousands of years ago, space travelers from other planets landed on Earth, where they taught us about technology and influenced religion. He is regarded by many as the father of ancient alien theory, also known as the ancient astronaut theory.
Most ancient alien theorists, including von Däniken, point to two types of evidence to back up their ideas. The first is ancient religious texts in which we witness and interact with gods or other heavenly thingss who descend from the sky—sometimes in vehicles like spaceships—and possess spectacular powers. The second is physical specimens such as cave art depicting alien figures and ancient architectural marvels like Stonehenge and the pyramids of Egypt.
If ET's visited this rock in the past, could they make an appearance in the future? For ancient theorists, the answer is a resounding yes. They believe that, by sharing their views with the world, they can help prepare future generations for the unstoppable encounter that awaits them.

If you think about it we are small compared to everything else in the galaxy, this rock is small. Most others are bigger and unlivable but you never know.

Aliens are on earth

I do believe they walk among us at some point. Its to open now to not be true. NSAS has proof and so does the Government.

What made it all start.

British scientists begin affirmation on conflicting activity afterwards sending a airship to the bend of space.
The aggregation of scientists beatific a airship 27km into the sky and captured baby biological bacilli they say can alone accept appear from space.
The group, headed up by astrobiologist Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe, claims the 'seeds of life' accept been transported amid planets by casual meteors.

Will we ever really know.

For as continued as I've been account about conflicting conspiracies, it's been an accustomed commodity of accepting a allotment of believers that the government was the adversary of the bodies and was conspiring with an conflicting race, or artlessly with added governments in our world, to accumulate affirmation of a acquainted exoteric attendance hidden.
In 2012, authors Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel became burning iconoclasts aural the accepter association if they appear a book, After Disclosure, that laid out anxiously what the government should do to adapt the accessible for the "disclosure" of the conspiracy. The book leans in to the angle itself. The government conspirators, say these two, anticipate that the cabal is bottomless and that a abounding and accessible altercation of the actuality of conflicting acquaintance is the best way to affiliate the world. Somehow.
This big abstruse will be appear in 2015, if the babble on shows like Coast-to-Coast AM is any indication. Why? Well, the "Grays" — the name accustomed to the aliens who either cabal with the government to accumulate their attendance hidden or are on the border of advancing the Earth — accept somehow accustomed an claiming to their animal co-conspirators. Maybe it's time to move altruism into the next appearance of their existence. Maybe bodies are battering the planet so abominably that the Grays, who charge the milk of the Earth to survive, are in peril. If bodies abort to acknowledge the Grays' existence, again the Grays will accomplish themselves accepted by, perhaps, a all-around television accident that shows off their gravity-defying hardware.
One-third to bisected of Americans accord absolute accepting to the achievability that aliens abide and are active a allotment of us. That's 80 actor to 100 actor adults. They don't just anticipate that conflicting DNA ability accept helped atom activity on Earth, or that activity exists abroad in the universe. They accept in the conspiracy. We amusement them as ninnies with tin-foil hats and bonanza stickers. But they are all of us!
I'm a agnostic of the Penn Jillette variety. I would not accept that a acquainted conflicting life-form had visited the Earth even if I were to accommodated an conflicting face-to-face. I assurance in my own eyes, in my own fallible, pattern-seeking brain, absolutely a bit beneath than I do the laws of science and the almanac of empiricism. However, bodies accept in awe-inspiring things for all sorts of reasons. Based on abstracts credibility alone, it should be abundant easier to accept in the actuality of ETs than it is to accept in creationism, and yet...
My absorption in the UFO association is motivated by entertainment, yes, but aswell by able curiosity.
The government is broadly unpopular. Americans see it blunder along, aloof to their concerns, clumsy to amount out how to absolutely enhance their lives, redistributing assets according to accepted whims, too abject to the interests that backing the politicians who run it. It is butterfingers of orchestrating above action changes after cogent hiccups. Whistle-blowers with absitively affirmation of government criminality allocution to The Washington Post, to Congress, or to Laura Poitras.
UFO believers authority two opposing beliefs. One is that the government we all apperceive is but a projected adumbration on the cave. The absolute government, the abysmal state, controls the apple and charcoal hidden. The added is that this government, all able and able of befitting an conflicting cabal from advancing out, is not all able and not able of befitting an conflicting cabal from advancing out. They've got witnesses; 500 military, intelligence, credentialed assemblage who can affirm to some allotment of the conspiracy. (Canada's above aegis minister!)
The about-face from paranoia to optimism aural the UFO association ability represent a new action to accretion accessible acceptance. UFO sightings go viral and are debunked just as quickly; perhaps, the believers believe, it's time to use the aforementioned approach that acknowledged political campaigns use to get the absolute media to pay attention, and to activate to actively burden political leaders to appear clean. (Whether the media is allotment of the cabal itself is...well, I can't acquaint you.) And look: The acknowledgment of conflicting activity would absolutely change the apple overnight. Big conflicts would assume irrelevant. It would be abundant easier to accouterment all-around problems if bodies were affected to anticipate of themselves as associates of a individual planet.
The scientists who seek for exoteric intelligence do not accept that aliens accept visited Earth. They anticipate that we ability aces up actual affirmation of the actuality of addition acculturation someday. (See the cine Contact, which was based on a book by Carl Sagan.)
Two awfully altered acceptance architectures both accede on this: "Disclosure" or analysis would change everything. I abide skeptical. But it's fun to anticipate about

Knowing there is more than just this.

 One of the abundant baffling problems of science. Nobody knows how, area or if activity originated. About all that is accepted for assertive is that microbial activity had accustomed itself on Earth by about three and a bisected billion years ago. In the absence of harder affirmation of what came before, there is affluence of ambit for disagreement.
Thirty years ago the prevailing appearance a part of biologists was that activity resulted from a actinic accident so doubtful it would be absurd to accept happened alert in the appreciable universe. That bourgeois position was exemplified by Nobel Prize–winning French biologist Jacques Monod, who wrote in 1970: “Man at endure knows that he is abandoned in the anesthetized aggregate of the universe, out of which he emerged alone by chance.” In contempo years, however, the affection has confused dramatically. In 1995 acclaimed Belgian biochemist Christian de Duve alleged activity “a catholic imperative” and declared “it is about apprenticed to arise” on any Earth-like planet. De Duve’s account able the acceptance a part of astrobiologists that the cosmos is abundant with life. Dubbed biological determinism by Robert Shapiro of New York University, this approach is sometimes bidding by adage that “life is accounting into the laws of nature.”